Globalists capitalize on conflict — creating chaos that leads toward a New World Order
By Mark Dinsmore
July 1, 2016
On the surface, the “Brexit” — or British exit from the European Union (EU) appears to deal a tremendous blow to the Masonic-elite’s globalist goal for a New World Order. With few exceptions, this was the general consensus among many conservative and libertarian-leaning bloggers and news personalities, especially those who are ardent Trump supporters.
In fact, the anti-establishment uprisings of both the Brexiteers and the Trump-eteers appear to conveniently mirror themselves, almost as if choreographed. And curiously, Trump just happened to be in the UK (Scotland) during the June 23 referendum, even as Vice President Joe Biden happened to be in the UK (Ireland) during the same period (we’ll explore this coincidence a little later).
Prior to the Brexit referendum, the elite bankers and politicians as well as talking head pundits were warning that a “leave” vote would usher in political instability and economic calamity. And right on cue, the confetti of the “leave” voters was hardly fallen to the floor before arch-globalist George Soros reinforced this narrative:
(Reuters) – Billionaire investor George Soros on Saturday called for thorough reconstruction of the European Union in order to save it, even though he warned that Britain’s vote to leave the bloc makes “disintegration of the EU practically irreversible.”
Soros, who warned of financial meltdown if Britain voted to leave the EU before Thursday’s referendum, also said the effects of the decision will likely damage Britain.
“Britain eventually may or may not be relatively better off than other countries by leaving the EU, but its economy and people stand to suffer significantly in the short to medium term,” he wrote in a commentary on the website Project Syndicate….
“Now the catastrophic scenario that many feared has materialized, making the disintegration of the EU practically irreversible,” wrote Soros. “The financial markets worldwide are likely to remain in turmoil as the long, complicated process of political and economic divorce from the EU is negotiated.”
He said the consequences for the real economy would be comparable to the financial crisis of 2007-2008.
Soros said the EU had broken down and ceased to satisfy its citizens’ needs and aspirations. Nevertheless, he called for support to reconstruct it.
“After Brexit, all of us who believe in the values and principles that the EU was designed to uphold must band together to save it by thoroughly reconstructing it,” he wrote. “I am convinced that as the consequences of Brexit unfold in the weeks and months ahead, more and more people will join us.”
Soros does not define what he means by a “thorough reconstruction.” But whatever is meant by this statement, it must come after what “the man who broke the bank of England” (in 1992) predicts is coming next: “the catastrophic scenario that many feared . . . the disintegration of the EU.” This catastrophic collapse, according to Soros, is “practically irreversible.” (emphasis added)
But presently, in direct opposition to Soros’ prediction that “more and more . . . will join us” there is a growing contingent of countries lining up to get out of the way of those who are “burning down the house.”
Such a devastating scenario as described by Soros sounds a lot like the motto of the Masonic Illuminati, whose stated goal is to bring “ordo ab chao” or “order from chaos.” (As we’ll touch on later, a common occult symbol of this cycle of destruction and rebirth is the mythical firebird, or phoenix, which is consumed by fire in the same manner as a sacrifice on the altar and then “resurrected” (or “reconstructed”) from its own ashes.)
Could this rush for the “exit” have been part of the globalist’s plan all along? At least one other discerning blogger, Brandon Smith of alt-market.com, is similarly skeptical:
In my post-Brexit commentary . . . [I] outlined why so many analysts in the mainstream and even in the liberty movement were caught completely unaware by the referendum results. Today, however, I now see hundreds of analysts using the same talking points I argued before the Brexit, but still missing the first and most VITAL underlying truth. The core reason why I was able to discern the Brexit outcome was because I accepted the reality that the Brexit does not hurt globalists — in the long run, it actually helps them.
Now, I fully understand the excitement surrounding this event. For many people it was a complete surprise because they assumed that international financiers and the ever-pervasive global elites would do anything to stop it from happening. It feels like a kind of revolution; a pointy stick in the eye of the beast. While I applaud the people of the U.K. for their ongoing battle for sovereignty, I can assure you that the Brexit is NOT an obstacle to the plans of globalists.
What is rather amazing to me is the number of people that, before the referendum vote, were arguing that the elites would “never allow” the Brexit to continue and were thoroughly convinced they would use their influence to disrupt it. Now, in the face of a successful vote, those same people now argue that the elites had no influence over the Brexit, and do not benefit from its passage.
Anyone who has played a strategy game is familiar with the tactic that is popularly called “reverse psychology.” Even children learn this game at a very early age (usually from their parents) pretending to warn against the very action that is the real desired outcome. Smith continues with this line of reasoning:
I would remind readers that it was actually “pro-EU” globalist puppet David Cameron himself that presented the prospect of a referendum to exit the EU. [http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/eu-referendum-david-camerons-strategy-to-keep-uk-in-europe-is-to-present-himself-as-the-man-in-the-a6729346.html] While some may argue this was bungling on the part of Cameron, I think this is a rather foolish notion. Cameron does what he is told like every other elitist-owned politician. Furthermore, the behavior of internationalists leading up to the Brexit was rather strange, hinting to me that they were preparing for a Brexit surprise.
Ha! Aren’t they ever so clever, dem ol’ globalists! As Brer Rabbit used to say to ol’ Brer Fox (before ol’ Uncle Remus was censored by political correctness): “Please don’ fling me in dat ol’ br’ar patch.” (Of course, Brer Rabbit desperately wanted to be flung into the “briar patch,” because he’d gotten himself stuck in Brer Fox’s trap of the Tar Baby.)
Similarly, the stratagems of Satan, “deceiver of the nations” never change; the tactics just get a little more convoluted.
Smith, a keen discerner of the globalist playbook, originally made some pre-Brexit predictions that echoed those of myself and a very short list of believers who are not only doctrinally-minded Bereans, but who are also politically aware and prophetically astute. Prior to the referendum, Brandon Smith similarly concluded:
…the failure of the EU does not necessarily mean a failure for the internationalists. For groups of globalists that promote an ideology of Fabian Socialism, a breakdown of the EU, whether partial or total, can be used as leverage for a larger and more centralized global power structure in the long term. Mark my words, when the system comes crashing down (whether after the Brexit or after another trigger event), internationalists will say that the EU failed not because it was centralized, but because it was not centralized ENOUGH.
If the Brexit succeeds, the globalists can allow the market systems they have been inflating for years to finally crash (at the speed they choose). They can then blame those dastardly “far-Right extremists” in the U.K. for triggering a domino effect within the global financial system, conveniently scapegoating British conservatives, moderates and sovereigns for a breakdown that was going to happen eventually anyway. Their solution will once again be to argue for the end of “barbaric” conservative principles and install complete centralization and socialism as the cure.
Even many who are antagonistic toward Christianity seem to understand the big-picture scenario better than many believers who turn to FOX News. What conservatives fail to realize is that “illuminated” servants of Satan—the prince of the power of the air—operate both ends of the broadcast spectrum to manipulate the minds of the masses both spiritually and politically). As this evangelical-cum-new-ager notes:
As we look into all this, it’s important to remember that the European Union was never meant to last. The only way the globalists could take down all the nations of Europe on cue was to lash them together under one currency, then crash the currency. This was always the true intent behind the adoption of the Euro, and this was the reason the globalists left their strongholds of England and Switzerland out of the currency. Unless the globalists press the delay button once again, the Euro will not exist by the end of this year. http://redefininggod.com/2016/05/globalist-agenda-watch-2016-update-11-the-1-year-delay-of-the-eu-collapse-ends-next-month/
Finally, while stopping short of placing the Brexit ramifications in the context of Bible prophecy, alt-market.com author Brandon Smith describes exactly the kind of economic end game that is necessary in order for the kingdom of Antichrist to emerge in global solidarity:
Bloomberg writes that the Brexit “casts a dark shadow on the world’s great move to openness,” as if globalism is a bastion principle of free markets rather than the murderer of free markets and the outright tyrannical socialization and centralization of everything. European elites are out in droves admonishing the Brexit as a move towards dangerous nationalism and isolationism. The Chinese premier is in the media warning of a “butterfly effect” in global markets caused by instability in “certain countries,” obviously referring to the U.K. and the EU. His solution? He wants even more “enhanced coordination” among all the economies of the world (Interpretation: more centralization).
EU officials only continue to strengthen my predictions by calling for an EU superstate in response to the Brexit; in other words, a completely centralized Europe.
BING! BING! BING!
Does this sound like the very “reconstruction” called for by currency-killer and empire-builder, George Soros?
Indeed, other globalist elite have repeatedly called for a New World Order, even in the wake of the Brexit.
And, Bloomberg has reported on Mario Draghi’s recent call for a “new world order” in response to the UK referendum in which central bank policies around the globe are completely coordinated. Bloomberg removed the word “NEW” from the article’s title an hour after it was published. Go figure; I guess mentioning the “new world order” was just a little too honest.
Note: President of the European Central Bank since 2011, Mario Draghi’s resume reveals him to be at the center of global finance. Born in Rome (1947), Draghi was the Italian Executive Director at the World Bank from 1984 to 1990. For the next ten years (1991 to 2001) he then served as general director of the Italian Treasury. Draghi was then vice chairman and managing director of Goldman Sachs International. He is also a trustee at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey and at the Brookings Institution, in Washington, D.C. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Draghi
Of course, Draghi does not mention that all central banks are ALREADY coordinated through the Bank for International Settlements, which is why numerous central bank heads were at the BIS when the Brexit vote was underway. What Draghi is pushing for is open centralization among the world’s central banks – the next step towards a single global central bank and a single global currency system.
An article on the emerging One World Economic Order would not be complete without considering the commentary of one of the global elite’s greatest “architects,” former Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger.
Appearing in the Wall Street Journal, June 28, 2016, Kissinger’s article, “Out of the Brexit Turmoil: Opportunity” opens with these words:
The cascade of commentary on Britain’s decision to leave institutional Europe has described the epochal event primarily in the vocabulary of calamity. However, the coin of the realm for statesmen is not anguish or recrimination; it should be to transform setback into opportunity. (emphasis added)
(Note: The rest of Kissinger’s article is worthy of dissection, but at another time. Those familiar with Kissinger’s diction when he is interviewed can’t help but wonder what organizational think-tank team actually pens his polished articles. But we’re satisfied that Kissinger and his globalist editors are of one mind with the UN and Council on Foreign Relations.)
“Transform setback into opportunity.”
Some readers may recall that Kissinger uttered remarkably similar words concerning Obama’s role in the aftermath of the 2008 economic collapse. On January 5, 2009, answering a reporter’s question on what then president-elect Obama’s priorities should be, Kissinger remarked:
“The president elect is coming into the office at a moment when there is upheaval at many parts of the world simultaneously…. But he can give a new impetus to American foreign policy, because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world. I think his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a New World Order can be created—it’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1r-3q9PXoM
These remarks by Kissinger mirror those of Rahm Emmanuel and Hillary Clinton, who have both remarked on separate occasions, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste” and “Never waste a good crisis.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb-YuhFWCr4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZ1FZM248Ks
In other words, whether the crisis is real or manufactured, it is standard operating procedure for the Powers That Be to use the event as leverage to advance a globalist agenda. This, of course, is how the Hegelian dialectic (“Problem-Reaction-Solution”) is used as a primary tool to force “change” in our world, both spiritually and politically.
[Surprisingly, many people have never heard of the Hegelian dialectic process. We won’t elaborate on it here, but I recommend the following biblically-based article: http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm]
We’ve covered a lot of ground in this installment, but this new information still leaves us with the question:
Was the Brexit vote an unexpected, serendipitous victory for “democracy” to be echoed in the United States through Donald Trump’s presidential bid? Or was the outcome known in advance or even “planned that way?”
In either case, we can see how the results and ramifications will only serve to position another puzzle piece in the picture of Bible prophecy.
At the very least, we do know that abundant evidence exists which implicates shadowy forces are involved in creating, staging, and managing crises around the world today. Destabilization of sovereign nations and establishing puppet regimes has been the lifeblood of corporatized cloak-and-dagger agencies for decades.
And in another segment we’ll present some signs to look for so that readers may begin to pick up on the patterns and “tells” of the elite concerning their non-verbal communication concerning their allegiance and agenda.
The bottom line is that believers should not be fearful or surprised that Satan is actively establishing his kingdom and that “evil men and seducers” are both wittingly and unwittingly preparing the world to receive Antichrist.
In their failure to biblically discern the times, Christians sometimes forget that Satan cannot simply wave a magic wand (or “use the force” as do the Jedi in Star Wars) to conquer the planet in the twinkling of an eye; rather, he is playing the “long con” through centuries of effort to thwart the purpose of God, who knows the end from the beginning, but who is long-suffering and not wiling for any to perish, but that all should come to repentance (2 Peter 3:9).
The most important role for believers today is to seek the Lord, establish godly and eternal priorities, and to set their houses in order both spiritually and physically as the coming crisis (or crises) in the UK and America begins to unfold. For as long as the Lord tarries (and He’s a great deal more long-suffering than us), the world will become an increasingly perilous place, even as small-“t” tribulation begins to manifest at home as well as abroad.
Knowing these things is not a cause to be anxious (Philippians 4:6-9); rather, it should be an encouragement and exhortation to set our sights on heaven—”for where your treasure is, there will your heart be also” (Matthew 6:21).
And even as we start to see the “beginning of the end” of the America wethought we knew coming into view, remember that Jesus promised, “lo, I am with you alway[s], even until the end of the world” (Matthew 28:20b).
Until next time, keep looking up!